Association Between Learning Approaches and Medical Student Academic Progression During Preclinical Training
Bansal,Sandeep (Creator), Bansal,Minakshi (Creator), White,Stanley (Creator)
Sandeep Bansal,1 Minakshi Bansal,2 Stanley White3 1Department of Medical Education, TCU and UNTHSC School of Medicine, Fort Worth, TX, USA; 2Harris College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Texas Christian University, Fort Worth, TX, USA; 3All Saints University School of Medicine, Roseau, Commonwealth of DominicaCorrespondence: Sandeep BansalDepartment of Medical Education, TCU & UNTHSC School of Medicine, Fort Worth, TX, USAEmail [email protected]: Students have diverse learning preferences that can impact the achievement of learning outcomes. However, there is a lack of unequivocal evidence for an association between the learning preferences and academic success. The purpose of the study was to examine the association between learning approaches and academic success of medical students during the basic science curriculum.Methods: In this cross-sectional comparative study, low-achieving (n=80) and high-achieving students (n=50) from semesters 1 through 3 of the Ross University School of Medicine’s basic science curriculum completed the Approaches and Study Skills Inventory for Students (ASSIST) short-form to provide data on their learning approaches. Student’s-t test was applied to find statistical differences in learning approaches of low and high achievers, and point-biserial was used to analyze the correlation between academic performance and learning approaches. Mean sum scores with standard deviation on ASSIST short-form scales (deep, surface, and strategic approaches) as well as subscales are reported.Results: High-achieving students reported a preference for using deep and strategic learning approaches compared to low-achieving students (p < 0.05). Low achievers indicated that they predominantly used the surface approach to learning (p< 0.05). Yet, “fear of failure,†a subscale of the surface approach, was greater among high achievers. Additionally, significant gender differences were found on subscales of “lack of purpose,†â
Downloadable Archival Material, English, 2021-11-18
Dove Press, 2021-11-18