Peer-reviewed
Biomechanical studies: science (f)or common sense?
Jos J Mellema, A L van der Zwan, Job N Doornberg, Thierry G Guitton, David Ring, A B Spoor, A B van Vugt, A D Armstrong, A Shrivastava, A L Wahegaonkar, A B Shafritz, J Adams, A Ilyas, A J H Vochteloo, A P Castillo, A Basak, P Andreas, A Barquet, A Kristan, A Berner, A B Ranade, S Ashish, A L Terrono, A Jubel, B Frieman, H B Bamberger, M P J van den Bekerom, W D Belangero, B F Hearon, J M Boler, F L Walter, M Boyer, B P D Wills, H Broekhuyse, R Buckley, B Watkins, B W Sears, R P Calfee, C Ekholm, C H Fernandes, C Swigart, C Cassidy, C J Wilson, L C Bainbridge, C Wilson, C M Jones, C Cornell, B D Crist, D F P van Deurzen, D Beingessner
It is our impression that many biomechanical studies invest substantial resources studying the obvious: that more and larger metal is stronger. The purpose of this study is to evaluate if a subset of biomechanical studies comparing fixation constructs just document common sense
Article, 2014
Injury, 45, 201412, 2035
2014